To Put Away the Gods
(Huberman and Hugetz, 1989)
To Put Away the Gods (mp4)
Commentary by Dr. Edmund Cueva
Chair of Arts and Humanities
 Huberman and Hugetz’ 1989 documentary, To Put Away the Gods, unintentionally shares its title with a passage from Joshua 24:14: “Now therefore
                           fear the LORD, and serve him in sincerity and in truth: and put away the gods which
                           your fathers served on the other side of the flood, and in Egypt; and serve ye the
                           LORD.” (King James Bible) Although the title was not selected from the Bible, the
                           biblical text can to some extent serve as a foil for the socio-religious changes taking
                           place in the documentary. The people of Israel were tasked to worship monotheistically
                           and to move away from the traditional practices created during their servitude in
                           Egypt, while the Lacandon Indians, as filmed by Huberman and Hugetz, have come to
                           a point in their cultural existence in which the younger members of that community
                           no longer worship their traditional deities. New attitudes are present among these
                           Mayan people—devotion and reverence to the old ways are challenged by the desire for
                           and acquisition of money and profit, by the intrusion of modern roads into their homes
                           in the rainforest of Chiapas, Mexico, and by the trucks that serve as one of the primary
                           means of communication and transmission between the new and old cultures.
Huberman and Hugetz’ 1989 documentary, To Put Away the Gods, unintentionally shares its title with a passage from Joshua 24:14: “Now therefore
                           fear the LORD, and serve him in sincerity and in truth: and put away the gods which
                           your fathers served on the other side of the flood, and in Egypt; and serve ye the
                           LORD.” (King James Bible) Although the title was not selected from the Bible, the
                           biblical text can to some extent serve as a foil for the socio-religious changes taking
                           place in the documentary. The people of Israel were tasked to worship monotheistically
                           and to move away from the traditional practices created during their servitude in
                           Egypt, while the Lacandon Indians, as filmed by Huberman and Hugetz, have come to
                           a point in their cultural existence in which the younger members of that community
                           no longer worship their traditional deities. New attitudes are present among these
                           Mayan people—devotion and reverence to the old ways are challenged by the desire for
                           and acquisition of money and profit, by the intrusion of modern roads into their homes
                           in the rainforest of Chiapas, Mexico, and by the trucks that serve as one of the primary
                           means of communication and transmission between the new and old cultures.  The Lacandon are not angered by these changes because they see it as part of the normal
                           cycle of existence and being: death, burial, and rebirth. It may be interpreted that
                           these events are merely part of the preparation for the putting away or burial of
                           the gods in the expectation and hope that these gods will return. This myth-cycle,
                           which is found in the Popol Vuh, the Mesoamerican myth-history that is sometimes referred to as the Mayan Book of Life or The Creation Story of the Maya, is also stressed in the documentary through its main character’s retelling of the
                           myth of the Mole Trapper Nuxi and his katabatic encounter with Kisin, the Mayan god
                           of death and earthquakes, and the god’s daughter.  Not only do Huberman and Hugetz
                           capture the struggle that stems from the loss of long-established beliefs and practices,
                           but, most importantly for scholars and students of mythology, they record the ba’alche
                           ritual that serves as the enactment of the Mole Trapper Myth. This ritual-myth documentary
                           fits in well with E. R. Leach’ ritualist theory that “myth, in my terminology, is
                           the counterpart of ritual: myth implies ritual, ritual implies myth, they are one
                           and the same” (The Political Systems of Highland Burma [London, 1954], 13). Although this film needs a good preparation or background in
                           the complexities of Mayan myth and ritual before it is viewed, it can and should be
                           used in comparative or world myth courses.
The Lacandon are not angered by these changes because they see it as part of the normal
                           cycle of existence and being: death, burial, and rebirth. It may be interpreted that
                           these events are merely part of the preparation for the putting away or burial of
                           the gods in the expectation and hope that these gods will return. This myth-cycle,
                           which is found in the Popol Vuh, the Mesoamerican myth-history that is sometimes referred to as the Mayan Book of Life or The Creation Story of the Maya, is also stressed in the documentary through its main character’s retelling of the
                           myth of the Mole Trapper Nuxi and his katabatic encounter with Kisin, the Mayan god
                           of death and earthquakes, and the god’s daughter.  Not only do Huberman and Hugetz
                           capture the struggle that stems from the loss of long-established beliefs and practices,
                           but, most importantly for scholars and students of mythology, they record the ba’alche
                           ritual that serves as the enactment of the Mole Trapper Myth. This ritual-myth documentary
                           fits in well with E. R. Leach’ ritualist theory that “myth, in my terminology, is
                           the counterpart of ritual: myth implies ritual, ritual implies myth, they are one
                           and the same” (The Political Systems of Highland Burma [London, 1954], 13). Although this film needs a good preparation or background in
                           the complexities of Mayan myth and ritual before it is viewed, it can and should be
                           used in comparative or world myth courses. 
